DA Best !!!!!Thank you, i used the Search Bible function exclusively, up until now, but that that quick concordance i can see it's usefulness.
The reason it doesn't already do this is because the linking mechanism (URL protocol) doesn't support all of the Bible search options. So, you can create a Bible search link in the editor, either by hand or using the insert menu, but you can't always "go the other way" from search results. ... The linking system only supports a subset of the Bible search options. This is something that has room for improvement and I appreciate the feedback.It would send a search link to the editor that produced the displayed search results in the current window. It would save a few steps in the editor to redo the work of creating a Bible search.
It depends on the length of the verse list. A long verse list will use up more space and a little bit more load time than a link to a Bible search. But I doubt if there is a practical or noticeable impact either way. However the more important consideration would probably be deep referencing. A Bible search link doesn't count as a "reference to a verse" in any way, so you won't have listings in the Verse or Topic Guides for the verses it produces.Is it better to have a list of verses or a search link in a note/topic from the point of view of SwordSearcher efficiency.
Just to be clear, I didn't mean going from search results back to a link, but rather going from the QC input boxes at the top (containing words or phrase and range) to a link. My thinking was that once a desired search result was obtained using the QC, the input parameters for that search are already known.but you can't always "go the other way" from search results