In college many years ago, I stumbled across "The Bible Self Explained: A Commentary Wholly Biblical: An Exposition in the Very Words of Scripture" by Moody Press, Chicago IL (2,348 pages, 1957) which I have since learned, appears to be a compilation of three older volumes of a work titled "The Commentary Wholly Biblical: An Exposition in the Very Words of Scripture by Samuel Bagster and Sons, London (1856). (Three volumes: Genises to Job, Psalms to Malachi and Matthew to Revelation.)
Bible Self Explained: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Bible_Self_explained/koFoYgEACAAJ?hl=en
Commentary Wholly Biblical: https://archive.org/details/commentarywholly01lond/page/n9/mode/2up
Both of these works are now in the public domain. I contacted Moody Press and they no longer have the masters or files of any kind for their compilation, to their knowledge.
I'm curious if any of these works are known / available to / within SwordSearcher. If not, would it be of interest to have these works as modules? There are some very interesting tables and timelines in the early pages.
There are features within SwordSearcher which potentially make this 1856 / 1957 collection somewhat redundant perhaps, but I think this work is a classic and one which could be interesting as a "commentary" - especially since it only uses other KJV verses as the "commentary".
Another way to look at it is this collection is an early paper approach / method of study which appears to be in the same vein as SwordSearcher at a somewhat foundational level (before computers existed).
Bible Self Explained: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Bible_Self_explained/koFoYgEACAAJ?hl=en
Commentary Wholly Biblical: https://archive.org/details/commentarywholly01lond/page/n9/mode/2up
Both of these works are now in the public domain. I contacted Moody Press and they no longer have the masters or files of any kind for their compilation, to their knowledge.
I'm curious if any of these works are known / available to / within SwordSearcher. If not, would it be of interest to have these works as modules? There are some very interesting tables and timelines in the early pages.
There are features within SwordSearcher which potentially make this 1856 / 1957 collection somewhat redundant perhaps, but I think this work is a classic and one which could be interesting as a "commentary" - especially since it only uses other KJV verses as the "commentary".
Another way to look at it is this collection is an early paper approach / method of study which appears to be in the same vein as SwordSearcher at a somewhat foundational level (before computers existed).