The tool is wonderful as it is, but I think I have an idea or two that would make it even better.
(1) How about if it could somehow chart out other ways a given word is translated in the KJV? E.g., you look up "Judas". How about a drop-down expansion triangle under "G2455" with a note "Also translated in KJV as …" and a list of other ways it's translated. Admittedly, the same info is (apparently*) also in the Strong's definition where it says, "Juda(-h, -s); Jude" so we can assume that it's rendered "Juda, Judah, Judas, Jude" in the KJV. I think having that info in the E-S indexer would be more convenient.
(2) I'm sure this is a bigger issue programmatically, but I'd like to be able to put more than one word in the English-Strong's indexer and see the results, for, e.g., Juda, Judah, Judas, Jude. It would be especially useful if it put them in a table form so that those linked to the same Strong's number were one one line.
Always asking for more, huh?
(1) How about if it could somehow chart out other ways a given word is translated in the KJV? E.g., you look up "Judas". How about a drop-down expansion triangle under "G2455" with a note "Also translated in KJV as …" and a list of other ways it's translated. Admittedly, the same info is (apparently*) also in the Strong's definition where it says, "Juda(-h, -s); Jude" so we can assume that it's rendered "Juda, Judah, Judas, Jude" in the KJV. I think having that info in the E-S indexer would be more convenient.
*I said "apparently" since I'm not convinced the data there always matches what the tagging of the text gives us.
(2) I'm sure this is a bigger issue programmatically, but I'd like to be able to put more than one word in the English-Strong's indexer and see the results, for, e.g., Juda, Judah, Judas, Jude. It would be especially useful if it put them in a table form so that those linked to the same Strong's number were one one line.
Always asking for more, huh?